Legal Opinion
Keeney v. City of Salem
Oregon Supreme Court
Decided July 10, 1935PublishedCited by 8 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtCampbell, C. J.
Plaintiff seeks to recover damages against the City of Salem, a municipal corporation, and E. C. Charlton, one of the city’s police officers.
She alleges in effect that she received her injuries through the recklessness and negligent acts of the police officer; that the city owns and maintains an automobile for the use of the members of the police department in the performance of their several duties in matters connected therewith; that, with the permission of the officers of the city, it was “frequently used by various ordinary police officers of the city for their own accommodation and…
2Cases cited2 opinions
- Antin v. Union High School District No. 2Oregon Supreme Court · 1929
- Rice v. City of PortlandOregon Supreme Court · 1932
3Cited by8 opinions
- Brindamour v. MurrayCalifornia Supreme Court · 1936
- Maas v. HarveySupreme Court of Louisiana · 1942
- West Linn Corporate Park, L.L.C. v. City of West LinnOregon Supreme Court · 2010
- District of Columbia v. AbramsonDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1959
- Megowan v. City of Los AngelesCalifornia Supreme Court · 1936
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.