Legal Opinion

Henriksen v. City of Rialto

California Court of Appeal

Decided December 14, 1993No. E008993Published

1Opinion of the Court

20 Cal.App.4th 1612 (1993)

25 Cal. Rptr.2d 308

RAY HENRIKSEN, Cross-complainant and Appellant,

v.

CITY OF RIALTO, Cross-defendant and Respondent.

Docket No. E008993.

Court of Appeals of California, Fourth District, Division Two.

December 14, 1993.

COUNSEL

Sprague, Tomlinson & Nydam and Kenneth W. Nydam for Cross-complainant and Appellant.

Cotkin, Collins & Franscell, Jeffrey L. Garland, Franscell, Strickland, Roberts & Lawrence, Tracy Strickland and S. Frank Harrell for Cross-defendant and Respondent.

OPINION

RAMIREZ, P.J.

Ray Henriksen appeals from the trial court's grant of summary judgment in favor of…

2Cases cited22 opinions

  1. Mary M. v. City of Los AngelesCalifornia Supreme Court · 1991
  2. AARTS Productions, Inc. v. Crocker National BankCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1986
  3. Perez v. Van Groningen & Sons, Inc.California Supreme Court · 1986
  4. Rodgers v. Kemper Construction Co.California Court of Appeal · 1975
  5. John R. v. Oakland Unified School DistrictCalifornia Supreme Court · 1989

17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API