Legal Opinion
Henriksen v. City of Rialto
California Court of Appeal
Decided December 14, 1993No. E008993PublishedCited by 7 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion
RAMIREZ, P. J.
Ray Henriksen appeals from the trial court’s grant of summary judgment in favor of the City of Rialto (hereinafter Rialto) on his cross-complaint arising out of an accidental injury inflicted by Henriksen, an off-duty police officer, on another off-duty officer. Appellant argues that Rialto was obligated as a matter of law to indemnify him for any damages recovered against him. We agree with the trial court and we affirm.
*1615Facts
On January 29, 1989, Chris Masotto filed suit against appellant Ray Henriksen and Rialto to recover damages for injuries Masotto suffered on March…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- Mary M. v. City of Los AngelesCalifornia Supreme Court · 1991
- Perez v. Van Groningen & Sons, Inc.California Supreme Court · 1986
- Rodgers v. Kemper Construction Co.California Court of Appeal · 1975
- John R. v. Oakland Unified School DistrictCalifornia Supreme Court · 1989
- Sprague v. Equifax, Inc.California Court of Appeal · 1985
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by7 opinions
- Medina v. FullerNew Mexico Court of Appeals · 1998
- Le Elder v. RiceCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1994
- Hodges v. YarianCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1997
- Rogers v. JordanNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 2001
- Henriksen v. City of RialtoCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1993
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.