Legal Opinion

Shields v. Oxnard Harbor District

California Court of Appeal

Decided August 12, 1941No. Civ. 13017; Civ. 13018PublishedCited by 39 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtMcCOMB, J.

The above entitled cases, which are actions to recover damages for injuries resulting from an automobile accident, were tried together before a jury in the superior court and by stipulation of counsel are submitted to this court upon a single record and set of briefs. From judgments in favor of plaintiffs, defendants appeal.

The evidence being viewed most favorably to plaintiffs (respondents), the essential facts are:

On June 17, 1939, defendant Oxnard Harbor District, was engaged in constructing a harbor in the county of Ventura. Defendant McDougall was employed by his codefendant Oxnard…

2Cases cited12 opinions

  1. People v. NakisCalifornia Supreme Court · 1920
  2. Heron v. RileyCalifornia Supreme Court · 1930
  3. Evans v. Superior CourtCalifornia Supreme Court · 1932
  4. Hume v. Fresno Irrigation DistrictCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1937
  5. King v. SchumacherCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1939

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by39 opinions

  1. People v. Western Fruit GrowersCalifornia Supreme Court · 1943
  2. Nunneley v. Edgar HotelCalifornia Supreme Court · 1950
  3. City of Pleasant Hill v. First Baptist ChurchCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1969
  4. Leming v. Oilfields Trucking Co.California Supreme Court · 1955
  5. Shapiro v. Equitable Life Assurance SocietyCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1946

34 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API