Legal Opinion

Peccolo v. City of Los Angeles

California Supreme Court

Decided March 29, 1937No. L. A. 16022PublishedCited by 41 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtCubtis, J.

After the decision of this cause by the District Court of Appeal, each of the parties thereto petitioned for a hearing in this court. The action is one to recover damages for injuries sustained in a collision between an automobile in which the respondent was riding and an auto truck driven by a third person. The automobile in which the respondent was riding at the time of his injury was owned by the Department of Water and Power of the City of Los Angeles, and was being driven by one of its employees. The trial court rendered judgment in favor of the respondent, the plaintiff in the action,…

2Cases cited14 opinions

  1. Chafor v. City of Long BeachCalifornia Supreme Court · 1917
  2. Bryant v. Pacific Electric Railway Co.California Supreme Court · 1917
  3. Davoust v. City of AlamedaCalifornia Supreme Court · 1906
  4. Pope v. HalpernCalifornia Supreme Court · 1924
  5. Nonn v. Chicago City Railway Co.Illinois Supreme Court · 1908

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by41 opinions

  1. McCann v. HoffmanCalifornia Supreme Court · 1937
  2. Loper v. MorrisonCalifornia Supreme Court · 1944
  3. Martinez v. Southern Pacific Co.California Supreme Court · 1955
  4. Fields v. SandersCalifornia Supreme Court · 1947
  5. Huebotter v. FollettCalifornia Supreme Court · 1946

36 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API