Brindamour v. Murray
California Supreme Court
1Opinion of the CourtShenk, J.
This is an appeal by the defendants Thomas Murray and the City of Los Angeles from a judgment for damages sustained by the plaintiffs and the intervener as the result of an automobile collision. The accident occurred about 11:20 P. M. on December 12, 1933, at the intersection of Twenty-first Street and Broadway in said city. The plaintiff, George Brindamour, a magician, accompanied by his wife, was driving his Essex car homeward after a performance at the Hippodrome theater. Going westerly on Twenty-first Street, he stopped his car at the intersection of that street and Broadway. He proceeded…
2Cases cited12 opinions
- Chafor v. City of Long BeachCalifornia Supreme Court · 1917
- Davoust v. City of AlamedaCalifornia Supreme Court · 1906
- Chapman v. StateCalifornia Supreme Court · 1894
- Kellar v. City of Los AngelesCalifornia Supreme Court · 1919
- Miller v. City of Palo AltoCalifornia Supreme Court · 1929
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by23 opinions
- Brummett v. County of SacramentoCalifornia Supreme Court · 1978
- Jurd v. Pacific Indemnity Co.California Supreme Court · 1962
- Peccolo v. City of Los AngelesCalifornia Supreme Court · 1937
- Oppenheimer v. City of Los AngelesCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1951
- Bryant v. County of MontereyCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1954
18 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.