Legal Opinion

Dyas v. Akston

Supreme Court of Connecticut

Decided November 28, 1950PublishedCited by 13 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtBaldwin, J.

This is an action to recover a real estate broker’s commission. The jury returned a verdict for the plaintiffs which the trial court, upon motion, set aside. The jury could reasonably have found the following facts: The defendant owned a colonial-type dwelling house, guest cottage, caretaker’s house, swimming pool and other outbuildings with about 100 acres of land in Ridgefield. She had not listed this property for sale with the plaintiffs but upon inquiry stated that she would sell for $60,000. The plaintiff Dyas had as prospective purchasers a Dr. and Mrs. Kingsbury. A meeting was arranged…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Cagianello v. City of HartfordSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1948
  2. Donovan v. Connecticut Co.Supreme Court of Connecticut · 1912
  3. Finch v. DonellaSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1950
  4. Rose v. Van BoschSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1935
  5. Wright v. ReidSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1930

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by13 opinions

  1. Storm Associates, Inc. v. BaumgoldSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1982
  2. Walsh v. TurlickSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1972
  3. Revere Real Estate, Inc. v. CeratoSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1982
  4. Thomas F. Rogers, Inc. v. HochbergSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1955
  5. Katz v. MartinSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1956

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API