Legal Opinion

Cagianello v. City of Hartford

Supreme Court of Connecticut

Decided December 2, 1948PublishedCited by 20 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

The plaintiff brought this action to recover for injuries suffered by reason of a fall caused by tripping over an elevated flag in a sidewalk of the defendant city. The jury rendered a verdict in her favor which the trial court set aside for lack of evidence that the defect had existed for sufficient time prior to the date of the fall to charge the defendant with notice.

The jury could have found the following facts: On the afternoon of June 19, 1944, the plaintiff, while walking on a public sidewalk on Bodwell Street, Hartford, stumbled over a flag which was elevated about two inches above…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. McGar v. Borough of BristolSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1899
  2. Cunningham, Admx. v. Fair Haven Westville R. Co.Supreme Court of Connecticut · 1899
  3. Banks v. WatrousSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1948
  4. Crowell v. Middletown Savings BankSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1937
  5. Falkowski v. MacDonaldSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1933

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by20 opinions

  1. State v. PackardSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1981
  2. Waldron v. RaccioSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1974
  3. State v. SwintonSupreme Court of Connecticut · 2004
  4. Bauer v. PoundsConnecticut Appellate Court · 2000
  5. State v. CastagnaSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1976

15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API