Legal Opinion
Finch v. Donella
Supreme Court of Connecticut
Decided May 2, 1950PublishedCited by 13 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtBrown, C. J.
In this action, the plaintiff, a real estate broker, sued to recover a commission agreed upon in connection with the sale of the defendant’s ' property in Ridgefield. The court rendered judgment for the plaintiff and the defendant has appealed.
We summarize the material facts established by the finding, which is not subject to correction. The plaintiff was and for many years had been a real estate broker, and the defendant was and for some time had been the owner of a residence on Branchville Road in Ridgefield. The defendant desired to sell her property, and after she had negotiated…
2Cases cited11 opinions
- Rosenfield v. WallSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1920
- Murphy v. LinskeySupreme Court of Connecticut · 1920
- Console v. TorchinskySupreme Court of Connecticut · 1922
- Home Banking & Realty Co. v. BaumSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1912
- Stagg v. LawtonSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1946
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by13 opinions
- Storm Associates, Inc. v. BaumgoldSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1982
- William Pitt, Inc. v. TaylorSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1982
- Dyas v. AkstonSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1950
- Pentin v. GonsowskiSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1951
- In Re KostingDistrict Court, D. Connecticut · 1972
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.