Legal Opinion
Rose v. Van Bosch
Supreme Court of Connecticut
Decided March 5, 1935PublishedCited by 9 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtHaines, J.
The plaintiff began an action in the Superior Court in Fairfield County against these defendants, Carl and Lillian Van Bosch, by writ and complaint dated March 17th, 1927, and served March 24th, 1927. Judgment was given November 9th, 1927, against Carl Van Bosch only. No part of the judgment had been paid when the plaintiff brought the present action against the same defendants December 4th, 1929. The original complaint alleged the judgment of November 9th, 1927, to have been $526 and costs in favor of the plaintiff “against the defendants” and that said judgment remained wholly unsatisfied.
Th…
2Cases cited14 opinions
- Scott v. ScottSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1910
- Mazulis v. ZeldnerSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1933
- Jordan v. ApterSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1919
- Hawes v. MooneySupreme Court of Connecticut · 1872
- Owen v. DixonSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1846
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by9 opinions
- Strimiska v. YatesSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1969
- Board of Police Commissioners v. WhiteSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1976
- Reciprocal Exchange v. Altherm, Inc.Supreme Court of Connecticut · 1955
- Esserman v. MaddenSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1937
- Lesser v. Altnacraig Convalescent Home, Inc.Supreme Court of Connecticut · 1957
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.