Legal Opinion

Katz v. Martin

Supreme Court of Connecticut

Decided February 21, 1956PublishedCited by 10 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtWynne, J.

This is an action for a broker’s commission on the sale of real estate formerly owned by the defendant. The court rendered judgment for the plaintiff, and from that judgment the defendant has appealed.

As to the controlling facts, the finding may be summarized as follows: In 1948 the defendant, a resident of California, owned several tracts of unimproved land in Stamford, one being a tract con*216taining approximately 62.45 acres and known as tract No. 2 on a map on file which showed the defendant’s holdings. She listed the property with the plaintiff in 1948. She agreed with the plaintiff upon a…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Dyas v. AkstonSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1950
  2. Hudick v. TyczSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1955
  3. Holmes v. City of New LondonSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1953

3Cited by10 opinions

  1. State v. CoulombeSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1956
  2. Krulikowski v. Polycast CorporationSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1966
  3. MacArthur v. CannonConnecticut Appellate Court · 1967
  4. West Hill Construction Corporation v. HorwathSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1962
  5. State v. HellerConnecticut Appellate Court · 1966

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API