Legal Opinion
Anthony Julian Railroad Construction Co. v. Mary Ellen Drive Associates
Connecticut Appellate Court
Decided September 8, 1998No. AC 17379PublishedCited by 9 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
*290 Opinion
SCHALLER, J.
The plaintiff, Anthony Julian Railroad Construction Company, Inc., appeals from the trial court’s refusal to issue a property execution, pursuant to General Statutes § 52-356a,1 for the claimed unsatisfied portion of a mechanic’s lien foreclosure judgment. On appeal, the plaintiff claims that the trial court abused its discretion by failing to issue the property execution for which the plaintiff properly applied. We affirm the judgment of the trial court.
The following relevant facts are recited in our decision in Anthony Julian Railroad Construction Co. v. Mary Ellen Drive…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- National CSS, Inc. v. City of StamfordSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1985
- City Lumber Co. of Bridgeport, Inc. v. MurphySupreme Court of Connecticut · 1935
- Gager v. WatsonSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1836
- Ames v. Sears, Roebuck & Co.Supreme Court of Connecticut · 1988
- The Martin Tire Rubber Co. v. the Kelly Tire RubberSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1923
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by9 opinions
- Dreambuilders Construction, Inc. v. DiamondConnecticut Appellate Court · 2010
- TD Banknorth, N.A. v. White Water Mountain Resorts of Connecticut, Inc.Connecticut Appellate Court · 2012
- State v. AlegrandConnecticut Appellate Court · 2011
- Chase Manhattan Mortgage Corp. v. St. Pierre (In Re St. Pierre)United States Bankruptcy Court, D. Connecticut · 2003
- Boris Corporation v. Plane Broker, Inc., No. Cv00-0162236s (Feb. 27, 2001)Connecticut Superior Court · 2001
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.