Legal Opinion

Ames v. Sears, Roebuck & Co.

Supreme Court of Connecticut

Decided January 19, 1988No. 13208PublishedCited by 18 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtPeters, C. J.

This appeal entails an examination of the circumstances under which a judgment debtor, by use of a writ of audita querela, can obtain relief from a final judgment awarding monetary damages to a judgment creditor. The defendant, Sears, Roebuck and Company, filed its application for a writ of audita querela alleging that the plaintiff, Laurie L. Ames, was threatening to cause execution to issue on a judgment in her favor in the amount of $175,000. Because the plaintiff had earlier received a payment of $25,000 from other alleged tortfeasors, the defendant claimed that its postjudgment payment…

2Cases cited16 opinions

  1. Ackermann v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1950
  2. Corey v. Avco-Lycoming DivisionSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1972
  3. Peck v. JacqueminSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1985
  4. Monroe v. MonroeSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1979
  5. Leonard McKNIGHT, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. UNITED STATES STEEL CORPORATION, Defendant-AppelleeCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1984

11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by18 opinions

  1. Convalescent Center of Bloomfield, Inc. v. Department of Income MaintenanceSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1988
  2. Hoffman v. McNamaraDistrict Court, D. Connecticut · 1988
  3. Mauro v. Yale-New Haven HospitalConnecticut Appellate Court · 1993
  4. Densberger v. United Technologies Corp.District Court, D. Connecticut · 2000
  5. United States v. AcholonuDistrict Court, D. Nevada · 1989

13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API