Legal Opinion

State v. Alegrand

Connecticut Appellate Court

Decided August 9, 2011No. AC 31200PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion

FLYNN, J.

The defendant, Claude Alegrand, appeals from the judgment of the trial court dismissing his motion for relief from judgment and sentence. On appeal, the defendant claims that the court erred in determining that it lacked subject matter jurisdiction to hear his motion for relief from judgment and sentence, a motion presented as an independent action in equity, or, in the alternative, as a petition for a writ of audita querela. As a third alternative, the defendant contends that even if we find that the court’s jurisdictional holding was correct, we should nonetheless, despite…

2Cases cited28 opinions

  1. Strickland v. WashingtonSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
  2. Padilla v. KentuckySupreme Court of the United States · 2010
  3. Summerville v. Warden, State PrisonSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1994
  4. United States v. Gary William HoltCourt of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 2005
  5. United States v. BandaCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1993

23 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. State v. MontanezConnecticut Appellate Court · 2014
  2. State v. BarrigaConnecticut Appellate Court · 2016
  3. State v. GuerraConnecticut Appellate Court · 2011
  4. 2 Fraser Place Condominium Assn., Inc. v. MathisConnecticut Appellate Court · 2024
  5. State v. GreenConnecticut Appellate Court · 2021

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API