State v. Alegrand
Connecticut Appellate Court
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion
FLYNN, J.
The defendant, Claude Alegrand, appeals from the judgment of the trial court dismissing his motion for relief from judgment and sentence. On appeal, the defendant claims that the court erred in determining that it lacked subject matter jurisdiction to hear his motion for relief from judgment and sentence, a motion presented as an independent action in equity, or, in the alternative, as a petition for a writ of audita querela. As a third alternative, the defendant contends that even if we find that the court’s jurisdictional holding was correct, we should nonetheless, despite…
2Cases cited28 opinions
- Strickland v. WashingtonSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
- Padilla v. KentuckySupreme Court of the United States · 2010
- Summerville v. Warden, State PrisonSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1994
- United States v. Gary William HoltCourt of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 2005
- United States v. BandaCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1993
23 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by5 opinions
- State v. MontanezConnecticut Appellate Court · 2014
- State v. BarrigaConnecticut Appellate Court · 2016
- State v. GuerraConnecticut Appellate Court · 2011
- 2 Fraser Place Condominium Assn., Inc. v. MathisConnecticut Appellate Court · 2024
- State v. GreenConnecticut Appellate Court · 2021