Legal Opinion

Boris Corporation v. Plane Broker, Inc., No. Cv00-0162236s (Feb. 27, 2001)

Connecticut Superior Court

Decided February 27, 2001No. CV00-0162236SUnpublished

1Opinion of the Court

[EDITOR'S NOTE: This case is unpublished as indicated by the issuing court.]

MEMORANDUM OF DECISION

The defendant, The Plane Broker, Inc., argues that the bond that was substituted for an aircraft lien should include the condition that the surety is obligated to pay interests, costs, penalties and attorney's fees based on General Statutes § 52-249.1 It is clear that if this action was for the foreclosure of a mechanic's lien or based upon a bond that had been substituted for a mechanic's lien, then the court would have the authority under § 52-249 (a) to include costs and fees, including…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Burkert v. Petrol Plus of Naugatuck, Inc.Supreme Court of Connecticut · 1990
  2. Chrysler Corp. v. MaioccoSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1989
  3. Doe v. StateSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1990
  4. Anthony Julian Railroad Construction Co. v. Mary Ellen Drive AssociatesConnecticut Appellate Court · 1998

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API