The Martin Tire Rubber Co. v. the Kelly Tire Rubber

Defendant claims that the facts stated in paragraphs eight and eleven of the finding should be corrected because they are inconsistent and found without evidence. The petitioner, on the other hand, says that these are findings of fact made upon undisputed evidence. The statement in paragraph eight, that the petitioner continued to furnish services in the completion of the contract for the construction of the building, we regard as a mixed conclu sion of law and fact; that the conclusion of fact must have been found from the other facts in the finding, and hence the conclusion is reviewable.…