Introducing ATLASLearn more
Legal Opinion

In Re Disciplinary Action Against Samborski

Supreme Court of Minnesota

Decided May 23, 2002No. C0-00-1380PublishedCited by 14 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

2Per curiam

The Director of the Office of Lawyers Professional Responsibility filed three petitions for disciplinary action against Steve C. Samborski. The first sought public discipline and the next two sought disbarment. Samborski was personally served with all three petitions, but answered none of them. The director moved for summary relief and we deemed the allegations contained in the three petitions admitted pursuant to Rule 13(b), Rules of Lawyers Professional Responsibility (RLPR). We conclude that the facts and circumstances of this case warrant disbarment.

Samborski was admitted to the…

3Cases cited19 opinions

  1. In Re Petition for Disciplinary Action Against IsaacsSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1990
  2. In Re Disciplinary Action Against WalkerSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1990
  3. In Re Disciplinary Action Against GeigerSupreme Court of Minnesota · 2001
  4. In Re Disciplinary Action Against LaChapelleSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1992
  5. In Re Disciplinary Action Against RandallSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1997

14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

4Cited by14 opinions

  1. In Re Disciplinary Action Against NelsonSupreme Court of Minnesota · 2007
  2. In Re Petition for Disciplinary Action Against RooneySupreme Court of Minnesota · 2006
  3. In Re Disciplinary Action Against BrooksSupreme Court of Minnesota · 2005
  4. In re Disciplinary Action Against MontezSupreme Court of Minnesota · 2012
  5. In Re Disciplinary Action Against De RyckeSupreme Court of Minnesota · 2006

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

View API DocsGet API Key

Powered by the Exa API