Heffernan v. Davis
California Court of Appeal
APPEAL from a judgment of the Superior Court of Siskiyou County and from an order refusing a new trial. James F. Lodge, Judge. The facts are stated in the opinion of the court.
1Opinion of the Court
This is an action of unlawful detainer. The cause was tried by the court and defendant had judgment. Plaintiff moved for a new trial which was denied and she appeals from the judgment and order.
It is alleged in the complaint that, on or about March 25, 1906, plaintiff's intestate by lease demised and let to defendant the premises described as follows: N1/2 of sec. 22, T. 40 N., R. 4 W., M. D. M., situated in Siskiyou County, a copy of which said lease is as follows:
"This certifies that I have this day, March 25th, 1906, leased to J. T. B. Davis, the Van place on sec. 22, T. 40, N. R., 4 W. M.…
2Cases cited9 opinions
- Seymour v. OelrichsCalifornia Supreme Court · 1909
- Glass v. HulbertMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1869
- Pearsall v. HenryCalifornia Supreme Court · 1908
- Niles v. HancockCalifornia Supreme Court · 1903
- Hill v. DenCalifornia Supreme Court · 1898
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by13 opinions
- Monarco v. Lo GrecoCalifornia Supreme Court · 1950
- Flint v. GiguiereCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1920
- Taylor v. OdellCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1942
- Feeney v. ClappCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1932
- Nolte v. Southern California Home Building Co.California Court of Appeal · 1938
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.