Legal Opinion
Feeney v. Clapp
California Court of Appeal
Decided October 11, 1932No. Docket No. 8374PublishedCited by 7 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
THE COURT.
The above action was brought by Margaret Feeney, since deceased, to recover installments of rent under a lease alleged to have been entered into by defendants on October 12, 1924. The answers admitted the execution of the lease by defendant Clapp but denied its execution by or on behalf of defendants Woodruff, who were copartners doing business under the name of F. H. Woodruff & Sons.
Mrs. Feeney was the owner of a ranch in San Benito County known as the Feeney place, which contained about 116 acres. Defendants Woodruff were engaged in the business of growing and marketing seeds, and…
2Cases cited12 opinions
- Ching Wing v. KishiCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1928
- Geary Street, Park & Ocean Railroad v. RolphCalifornia Supreme Court · 1922
- Ferguson v. McBeanCalifornia Supreme Court · 1891
- Laack v. DimmickCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1928
- Aronson & Co. v. PearsonCalifornia Supreme Court · 1926
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by7 opinions
- Monarco v. Lo GrecoCalifornia Supreme Court · 1950
- Corporation of America v. Durham Mutual Water Co.California Court of Appeal · 1942
- Corporation of America v. HarrisCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1935
- Cook v. La Vina Land Co.California Court of Appeal · 1934
- Warington Lumber Co. v. Fullerton Mortgage & Escrow Co.California Court of Appeal · 1963
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.