Beardsley v. Clem
California Supreme Court
The facts are stated in the opinion.
1Opinion of the Court
CHIPMAN, C.
Rescission. Defendants had judgment, from which plaintiffs appeal on the judgment-roll alone.
The original plaintiffs were Clarence L. Beardsley and Grace M. Beardsley, his wife. Defendants were husband and wife. Aftér a demurrer had been sustained to the complaint, and pending demurrer to the amended complaint, plaintiff Clarence died, and plaintiff Grace was substituted as administratrix of her husband’s estate, and a supplementary and amended complaint was filed, which was answered, and the cause was tried by the court on these pleadings.
Plaintiffs owned a ten-acre tract of land…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- McDougald v. HuletCalifornia Supreme Court · 1901
- Carpy v. DowdellCalifornia Supreme Court · 1897
- Illinois Trust & Savings Bank v. Pacific Railway Co.California Supreme Court · 1896
- Ortega v. CorderoCalifornia Supreme Court · 1891
- Horton v. DominguezCalifornia Supreme Court · 1886
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by21 opinions
- Silvers v. GrossmanCalifornia Supreme Court · 1920
- Freeman v. Gray-Cowan, Inc.California Supreme Court · 1933
- Peck v. NoeeCalifornia Supreme Court · 1908
- Crofoot Lumber, Inc. v. ThompsonCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1958
- Johnson v. SchimpfCalifornia Supreme Court · 1925
16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.