Legal Opinion
Thompson v. MacHado
California Court of Appeal
Decided April 1, 1947No. Civ. 7276PublishedCited by 20 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
THE COURT.
Plaintiff, as assignee of Walter Jansen & Son, brought this action for the recovery of $1194.43, alleged to be the balance due upon an open book account for goods sold and services performed by Walter Jansen & Son for defendants. A second count was based upon an account stated for the same amount.
Defendant denied the allegations of the complaint and also pleaded the statute of limitations, Code of Civil Procedure, section 337, subdivision 2. A jury being waived, the cause was tried by the court and resulted in a judgment for plaintiff, on the first count only, against defendant…
2Cases cited19 opinions
- Smellie v. Southern Pacific Co.California Supreme Court · 1931
- Loper v. MorrisonCalifornia Supreme Court · 1944
- People v. CaldwellCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1942
- Stanhope v. Los Angeles College of ChiropracticCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1942
- Ferroni v. Pacific Finance Corp.California Supreme Court · 1943
14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by20 opinions
- Iverson v. Atlas Pacific EngineeringCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1983
- People v. SchmidtCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1956
- Chillstrom v. Trojan Seed Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1954
- County of Sonoma v. GRANT W.California Court of Appeal · 1986
- People v. TorresCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1962
15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.