Legal Opinion
Sloan v. Hiatt
California Court of Appeal
Decided October 27, 1966No. Civ. 22907PublishedCited by 6 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtSims, J.
Plaintiffs and cross-defendants Sloan, hereinafter referred to as landowners, appeal from a judgment which denied them any relief on their complaint for damages for trespass against defendant’s intestate, hereinafter referred to as logger, and which awarded defendant and cross-complainant administratrix 1 $63,899.63 damages upon a cross-complaint for breach of a contract for the sale of timber.
From conflicting evidence, the trial court found: “On or about the 24th day of February, 1962, [logger] and [landowners], entered into an oral agreement . . . under the terms of which [landowners]…
2Cases cited48 opinions
- Monarco v. Lo GrecoCalifornia Supreme Court · 1950
- Feeney v. HowardCalifornia Supreme Court · 1889
- Carpy v. DowdellCalifornia Supreme Court · 1897
- Shindler v. . HoustonNew York Court of Appeals · 1848
- Miller v. PetersCalifornia Supreme Court · 1951
43 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by6 opinions
- C. R. Fedrick, Inc. v. Borg-Warner CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1977
- Allied Grape Growers v. Bronco Wine Co.California Court of Appeal · 1988
- Roam v. KoopCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1974
- Distribu-Dor, Inc. v. KaradanisCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1970
- Bagby Land and Cattle Company v. California Livestock Commission CompanyCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1971
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.