In Re Complaint as to the Conduct of Fadeley
Oregon Supreme Court
1Per curiam
In this lawyer disciplinary proceeding, the Oregon State Bar (Bar) charged the accused with violating Oregon Code of Professional Responsibility Disciplinary Rule (DR) 9-101(A) (failure to deposit client funds in trust); DR 9-101(C)(3) (failure to render appropriate accounting of client funds); DR 2-106(A) (collecting clearly excessive fee); and DR 2-110(A)(3) (failure promptly to refund unearned fee). A trial panel of the Disciplinary Board found that the accused had violated each of those rules and suspended him for 30 days. On de novo review, we affirm the trial panel’s decision.
In late…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- State v. AmayaOregon Supreme Court · 2004
- In Re GastineauOregon Supreme Court · 1993
- In Re Complaint as to the Conduct of BiggsOregon Supreme Court · 1994
- In Re Complaint as to the Conduct of BaloccaOregon Supreme Court · 2007
- In Re Complaint as to the Conduct of EakinOregon Supreme Court · 2002
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by6 opinions
- In Re Complaint as to the Conduct of ObertOregon Supreme Court · 2012
- In Re Complaint as to the Conduct of KnappenbergerOregon Supreme Court · 2008
- In Re Complaint as to the Conduct of PetersonOregon Supreme Court · 2010
- In re BertoniOregon Supreme Court · 2018
- State v. GattoCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2020
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.