Legal Opinion

State v. Amaya

Oregon Supreme Court

Decided April 29, 2004No. D9707503M; CA A104692; SC S49344PublishedCited by 101 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtBalmer, J.

In this criminal case, we consider the extent to which a police officer who has made a valid traffic stop of a vehicle may question a person in the vehicle about safety matters unrelated to the purpose of the stop. We hold, first, that ORS 810.410(3)(d), set out below, permitted the police officer’s inquiries of defendant, who was a passenger in the stopped vehicle. We further hold that, because the officer reasonably was concerned for his safety, Article I, section 9, of the Oregon Constitution permitted his inquiry. Accordingly, we agree with the Court of Appeals that the trial court did…

2Cases cited11 opinions

  1. Ball v. GladdenOregon Supreme Court · 1968
  2. State v. EhlyOregon Supreme Court · 1993
  3. State v. WyattOregon Supreme Court · 2000
  4. State v. HolmesOregon Supreme Court · 1991
  5. State v. BatesOregon Supreme Court · 1987

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by101 opinions

  1. State v. HallOregon Supreme Court · 2005
  2. State v. RodgersOregon Supreme Court · 2010
  3. State v. WalkerOregon Supreme Court · 2011
  4. State v. ParkinsOregon Supreme Court · 2009
  5. State v. Clemente-PerezOregon Supreme Court · 2015

96 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API