Legal Opinion

State v. Gatto

Court of Appeals of Oregon

Decided May 13, 2020No. A164144PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

210 Argued and submitted October 18, 2018, reversed and remanded May 13, 2020 STATE OF OREGON, Plaintiff-Respondent, v. PHILIP ANTHONY GATTO III, Defendant-Appellant. Washington County Circuit Court 16CR45834; A164144

466 P3d 981

In this criminal case, defendant assigns error to the trial court’s denial of his motion to suppress evidence obtained following a warrantless search of his hotel room. Defendant asserts that, under Article I, section 9, of the Oregon Constitution, he retained a privacy interest in the hotel room because he had not relinquished control of the room. The state…

2Cases cited18 opinions

  1. Stoner v. CaliforniaSupreme Court of the United States · 1964
  2. Ball v. GladdenOregon Supreme Court · 1968
  3. State v. CampbellOregon Supreme Court · 1988
  4. State v. MontezOregon Supreme Court · 1990
  5. Pereida-Alba v. CourseyOregon Supreme Court · 2015

13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. State v. PeekCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2021
  2. State v. WilliamsCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2022
  3. State v. HopkinsCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2022
  4. State v. MooreCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2020
  5. State v. DoradoCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2020

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API