Legal Opinion
Licht v. Gallatin
California Court of Appeal
Decided June 29, 1927No. Docket No. 3256PublishedCited by 6 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtFinch, P. J.
The trial court sustained the defendants’ demurrer to the third amended complaint without leave to amend and judgment was thereupon entered in favor of defendants. The plaintiff has appealed from the judgment.
The following facts are alleged in said complaint: June 5, 1918, defendant Gallatin leased to George Manóles, for a term of five years, a three-story brick building in the city of Sacramento. By the terms of the lease Manóles agreed “not to let or underlet the whole or any part of said premises . . . without the written consent” of the lessor. June 21, 1918, Manóles leased a part of the…
2Cases cited17 opinions
- J. S. Potts Drug Co. v. BenedictCalifornia Supreme Court · 1909
- Fredericks v. TracyCalifornia Supreme Court · 1893
- Arnold v. American Insurance Co.California Supreme Court · 1906
- Harrelson v. Miller & Lux Inc.California Supreme Court · 1920
- Alaska Salmon Co. v. Standard Box Co.California Supreme Court · 1910
12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by6 opinions
- People v. KlopstockCalifornia Supreme Court · 1944
- Overton v. WhiteCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1937
- Martin v. AuerbachCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1949
- Ware v. StaffordCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1957
- Northwestern Pacific Railroad v. Consumers Rock & Cement Co.California Court of Appeal · 1942
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.