Harrelson v. Miller & Lux Inc.
California Supreme Court
The facts are stated in the opinion of the court. Stephens & Stephens and Power & MacFadzean for Plaintiff and Appellant. Edward F. Treadwell, Farnsworth & McClure, and Berkeley B. Blake for Defendant and Appellant.
1Opinion of the CourtLennon, J.
—Plaintiff was the owner of about 5,880 acres of land in Tulare County. This land was let by plaintiff to one L. B. Crow in 1910 for a term of three years, which was afterward extended ' to the first day of October, 1916. In June, 1916, Crow granted to defendant Miller & Lux the right to pasture said land with sheep. For this right Miller & Lux paid to Crow the sum of $3,040. After the sheep were taken on to the land, plaintiff received information of the fact and ordered defendant to remove them, which it ydid. Plaintiff thereupon instituted this suit to recover damages from defendant for…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- Sharon v. SharonCalifornia Supreme Court · 1885
- Baldwin v. JacobsSupreme Court of Iowa · 1918
- In Re Estate of StoneCalifornia Supreme Court · 1916
- Meley v. BoulonCalifornia Supreme Court · 1894
- Anderson v. PhegleyOregon Supreme Court · 1909
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by38 opinions
- Sproul v. GilbertOregon Supreme Court · 1961
- Owsley v. HamnerCalifornia Supreme Court · 1951
- California Employment Commission v. KovacevichCalifornia Supreme Court · 1946
- Girard v. Monrovia City School DistrictCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1953
- Glassco v. El Sereno Country Club, Inc.California Supreme Court · 1932
33 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.