Legal Opinion

Arnold v. American Insurance Co.

California Supreme Court

Decided February 10, 1906No. L.A. No. 1544PublishedCited by 52 opinions

The facts are stated in the opinion of the court.

1Opinion of the CourtAngellotti, J.

This action was brought to recover on three policies of insurance against loss by fire, made by defendant to plaintiff. Judgment went for plaintiff for the full amount claimed, and defendant appeals from such judgment and from an order denying its motion for a new trial.

It is claimed that the amended complaint failed to state facts sufficient to constitute a cause of action. A general demurrer for want of facts was interposed in the lower court and overruled. The facts material to this contention, as shown by the complaint, are as follows, viz.: One of the policies was for fifteen hundred…

2Cases cited16 opinions

  1. Westchester Fire Insurance v. EarleMichigan Supreme Court · 1876
  2. Hildreth v. Montecito Creek Water Co.California Supreme Court · 1903
  3. Horton v. Home Insurance Co.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1898
  4. Murray v. Home Benefit Life Ass'nCalifornia Supreme Court · 1891
  5. Allen v. Home Insurance Co.California Supreme Court · 1901

11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by52 opinions

  1. Steven v. Fidelity & Casualty Co.California Supreme Court · 1962
  2. Lipman v. Brisbane Elementary School DistrictCalifornia Supreme Court · 1961
  3. Raulet v. Northwestern Nat'l Ins. Co. of MilwaukeeCalifornia Supreme Court · 1910
  4. Weininger v. Metropolitan Fire InsuranceIllinois Supreme Court · 1935
  5. McCollough v. Home Ins. Co. of N.Y.California Supreme Court · 1909

47 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API