Alaska Salmon Co. v. Standard Box Co.
California Supreme Court
The facts are stated in the opinion of the court.
1Opinion of the Court
The action was for damages for breach of contract. The case was tried before a jury whose verdict was given for plaintiff. From the judgment which followed and from the order of the court denying defendant's motion for a new trial it appeals.
The complaint charged that in October, 1905, plaintiff and defendant entered into a contract whereby defendant agreed to manufacture for plaintiff one hundred thousand wooden boxes to be delivered during the canning seasons of 1906 and 1907 as called for by plaintiff for its use in the business of manufacturing and selling canned salmon. Defendant…
2Cases cited4 opinions
- Broder v. ConklinCalifornia Supreme Court · 1888
- Bradford Investment Co. v. JoostCalifornia Supreme Court · 1897
- Nunez v. MorganCalifornia Supreme Court · 1888
- Barron v. FrinkCalifornia Supreme Court · 1866
3Cited by33 opinions
- Steelduct Co. v. Henger-Seltzer Co.California Supreme Court · 1945
- Traub Co. v. Coffee Break Service, Inc.California Supreme Court · 1967
- Vitagraph, Inc. v. Liberty Theatres Co.California Supreme Court · 1925
- Russell v. RammCalifornia Supreme Court · 1927
- Rudneck v. Southern California Metal & Rubber Co.California Supreme Court · 1920
28 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.