Legal Opinion

Fredericks v. Tracy

California Supreme Court

Decided July 13, 1893No. 15034PublishedCited by 54 opinions

Appeal from a judgment of the Superior Court of the City and County of San Francisco. The facts are stated in the opinion,

1Opinion of the Court

Searls, C.

This was an action in claim and delivery.

Plaintiff had judgment, and S. Selig, one of the defendants, appeals. The cause comes up on the judgment-roll. The action was commenced on the nineteenth day of November, 1890.

The complaint avers that the plaintiff was on the seventeenth day of November, 1890, the owner and entitled to the immediate possession of all the following goods and chattels, to wit: (Then follows a description of the goods.)

That defendant without the consent of the plaintiff now detains said goods and chattels from the possession of said plaintiff; that on the…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Affierbach v. McGovernCalifornia Supreme Court · 1889
  2. Alden & Co. v. CarverSupreme Court of Iowa · 1862

3Cited by54 opinions

  1. Glass v. Basin & Bay State Mining Co.Montana Supreme Court · 1904
  2. Teater v. Good Hope Development Corp.California Supreme Court · 1939
  3. Boles v. StilesCalifornia Supreme Court · 1922
  4. Garcia v. GunnCalifornia Supreme Court · 1897
  5. Herzog v. Atchison, Topeka & Santa Fe R.R.California Supreme Court · 1908

49 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API