Legal Opinion
Martin v. Auerbach
California Court of Appeal
Decided October 19, 1949No. Civ. 17136PublishedCited by 6 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtWilson, J.
Plaintiff appeals from a judgment denying relief in an action to rescind an assignment which defendant made to him of a half interest in a lease of real property and in the business conducted therein.
The following facts appear from the settled statement and the findings: In April, 1945, defendant became the lessee of a business property and thereafter conducted a cafeteria therein; the lease was for the term of ten years and among other things provided; 1 ‘ That the lessee will not assign this lease or any interest therein . . . without the written consent of the lessor first had and…
2Cases cited11 opinions
- People v. KlopstockCalifornia Supreme Court · 1944
- Chapman v. Great Western Gypsum Co.California Supreme Court · 1932
- Grimes v. NicholsonCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1945
- Buchanan v. BantaCalifornia Supreme Court · 1928
- Bailey Trading Co. v. LevyCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1925
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by6 opinions
- Larsen Sheep Co. v. SjogrenWyoming Supreme Court · 1951
- Karbelnig v. BrothwellCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1966
- Sketchley v. LipkinCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1950
- Sexton v. NelsonCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1964
- R-Ranch Markets 2, Inc. v. Old Stone BankCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1993
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.