Legal Opinion
Smith v. Greenfield State Bank
California Court of Appeal
Decided December 4, 1963No. Civ. 260PublishedCited by 4 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
BROWN, (R.M.), J.
— Appellant bank appeals from a judgment in favor of respondent for $1,200 for damages for the conversion of a harvester, said action being brought by the respondent administratrix of the estate of Guy 0. Smith, deceased.
The decedent died May 14, 1960. In September 1957 the decedent had purchased a harvester on a conditional sales contract to which the signature of his son, Raymond O. Smith, was also added, and which was subsequently assigned to the appellant. On January 5, 1959, the decedent executed a revision agreement altering the payment under the contract and again on…
2Cases cited9 opinions
- Martin Music Co. v. RobbCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1931
- Potts v. MehrmannCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1920
- Magraw v. McGlynnCalifornia Supreme Court · 1864
- Ormsby v. DearbornMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1874
- Smith v. MillerCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1935
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by4 opinions
- B.K.K. Co. v. SchultzCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1970
- Cerra v. BlackstoneCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1985
- Challenge-Cook Bros., Inc. v. LantzCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1967
- Fox v. DehnCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1974