Legal Opinion

Smith v. Miller

California Court of Appeal

Decided March 28, 1935No. Civ. 9079PublishedCited by 10 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OGDEN, J., pro tem.

This is an action in conversion brought by the assignee of Mr. and Mrs. George Peak against defendants and appellants, a public warehouseman, for the value of certain items of household furniture stored with him by the Peaks and which he was unable to redeliver to them upon demand. Appellant admitted his failure to redeliver the goods and offered in excuse thereof that he had delivered them upon demand to the W. & J. Sloane company, the true owner. The trial court gave judgment in the amount of five hundred and fifty dollars, found to be the value of the goods. The…

2Cases cited14 opinions

  1. Jeffers v. Easton, Eldridge & Co.California Supreme Court · 1896
  2. Johnson v. KaeserCalifornia Supreme Court · 1925
  3. Hines v. WardCalifornia Supreme Court · 1898
  4. Wetherly v. StrausCalifornia Supreme Court · 1892
  5. Martin Music Co. v. RobbCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1931

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by10 opinions

  1. Steiner v. RowleyCalifornia Supreme Court · 1950
  2. Fageol Truck & Coach Co. v. Pacific Indemnity Co.California Supreme Court · 1941
  3. Byer v. Canadian Bank of CommerceCalifornia Supreme Court · 1937
  4. Ravizza v. Budd & Quinn, Inc.California Supreme Court · 1942
  5. Beaudry v. PetersonCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1942

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API