Legal Opinion

Challenge-Cook Bros., Inc. v. Lantz

California Court of Appeal

Decided November 30, 1967No. Civ. 24009PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtSims, J.

Defendant Lantz, who executed a guarantee of a lease under which plaintiff’s assignor leased equipment to the lessee, has appealed from a judgment which awarded the plaintiff damages against the lessee, who defaulted, and Lantz.

The guarantor contends that there was no consideration for the guarantee; that repossession of the equipment following the lessee’s default terminated the lease as a matter of law and limited the damages to the rentals accrued to that time; that the award of rental payments accruing after repossession, while the goods were retained, constitutes the enforcement of a…

2Cases cited27 opinions

  1. United States Leasing Corp. v. duPontCalifornia Supreme Court · 1968
  2. Phillips-Hollman, Inc. v. Peerless Stages, Inc.California Supreme Court · 1930
  3. Fidelity & Deposit Co. v. WhitsonCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1960
  4. Phillips v. StarkCalifornia Supreme Court · 1921
  5. First-Trust Joint Stock Land Bank of Chicago v. MeredithCalifornia Supreme Court · 1936

22 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Puritan Leasing Co. v. AugustCalifornia Supreme Court · 1976
  2. Loudermilk v. Feld Truck Leasing Co. of Ind.Indiana Court of Appeals · 1976
  3. Oakland Bank of Commerce v. WashingtonCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1970
  4. Heidt v. Miller Heating & Air Conditioning Co.California Court of Appeal · 1969

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API