Challenge-Cook Bros., Inc. v. Lantz
California Court of Appeal
1Opinion of the CourtSims, J.
Defendant Lantz, who executed a guarantee of a lease under which plaintiff’s assignor leased equipment to the lessee, has appealed from a judgment which awarded the plaintiff damages against the lessee, who defaulted, and Lantz.
The guarantor contends that there was no consideration for the guarantee; that repossession of the equipment following the lessee’s default terminated the lease as a matter of law and limited the damages to the rentals accrued to that time; that the award of rental payments accruing after repossession, while the goods were retained, constitutes the enforcement of a…
2Cases cited27 opinions
- United States Leasing Corp. v. duPontCalifornia Supreme Court · 1968
- Phillips-Hollman, Inc. v. Peerless Stages, Inc.California Supreme Court · 1930
- Fidelity & Deposit Co. v. WhitsonCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1960
- Phillips v. StarkCalifornia Supreme Court · 1921
- First-Trust Joint Stock Land Bank of Chicago v. MeredithCalifornia Supreme Court · 1936
22 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by4 opinions
- Puritan Leasing Co. v. AugustCalifornia Supreme Court · 1976
- Loudermilk v. Feld Truck Leasing Co. of Ind.Indiana Court of Appeals · 1976
- Oakland Bank of Commerce v. WashingtonCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1970
- Heidt v. Miller Heating & Air Conditioning Co.California Court of Appeal · 1969