Legal Opinion

Potts v. Mehrmann

California Court of Appeal

Decided December 24, 1920No. Civ. No. 3522PublishedCited by 12 opinions

The facts are stated in the opinion of the court.

1Opinion of the Court

WOOD, P. J., pro tem.

This is an appeal from a judgment of nonsuit. The action was brought to set aside, as a fraud upon creditors, a trust executed voluntarily by the decedent, Mary Potts, in her lifetime, to the defendant Oakland Bank of Savings. By the terms of the writing she transferred to the bank the sum of $3,245, and made provision therein for medical attention and medicines during her life, for the payment of the expenses of .her last illness and funeral, and for the disposition after her death of the remainder of the fund among certain of her relatives. There was also a provision…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. In Re the Estate of ArnoldCalifornia Supreme Court · 1905
  2. Daley v. RussCalifornia Supreme Court · 1890
  3. Ohm v. Superior CourtCalifornia Supreme Court · 1890
  4. Shiels v. NathanCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1910
  5. Hills v. SherwoodCalifornia Supreme Court · 1874

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by12 opinions

  1. Lawless v. CalawayCalifornia Supreme Court · 1944
  2. Gobins v. Comm'rUnited States Tax Court · 1952
  3. Moore v. MoffattCalifornia Supreme Court · 1922
  4. In Re Mercury Engineering, Inc.District Court, S.D. California · 1946
  5. Feltham v. BlunckIdaho Supreme Court · 1921

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API