Legal Opinion

Martin Music Co. v. Robb

California Court of Appeal

Decided July 9, 1931No. Docket No. 857PublishedCited by 20 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

GRIFFIN, J., pro tem.

The plaintiff, claiming to he the owner and entitled to the possession of a certain piano, brought this action to recover possession thereof. Judgment having been entered in favor of defendant, the plaintiff appeals therefrom.

The right of possession in plaintiff is based on a monthly installment note contract under which defendant agreed to pay $2,250. She was given credit thereon in the sum of $286, being in default as to the balance due of $1964. The evidence indicates that a piano was taken in by plaintiff from defendant in the transaction. The contract bears date…

2Cases cited13 opinions

  1. Cromwell v. County of SacSupreme Court of the United States · 1877
  2. Cromwell v. County of SacSupreme Court of the United States · 1878
  3. Parke & Lacy Co. v. White River Lumber Co.California Supreme Court · 1894
  4. Hines v. WardCalifornia Supreme Court · 1898
  5. Nauman Co. v. BradshawCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1912

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by20 opinions

  1. Fageol Truck & Coach Co. v. Pacific Indemnity Co.California Supreme Court · 1941
  2. B.K.K. Co. v. SchultzCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1970
  3. Smith v. MillerCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1935
  4. FRESHMAN, MULVANEY, MARANTZ v. Superior CourtCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1985
  5. Ravizza v. Budd & Quinn, Inc.California Supreme Court · 1942

15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API