Martin Music Co. v. Robb
California Court of Appeal
1Opinion of the Court
GRIFFIN, J., pro tem.
The plaintiff, claiming to he the owner and entitled to the possession of a certain piano, brought this action to recover possession thereof. Judgment having been entered in favor of defendant, the plaintiff appeals therefrom.
The right of possession in plaintiff is based on a monthly installment note contract under which defendant agreed to pay $2,250. She was given credit thereon in the sum of $286, being in default as to the balance due of $1964. The evidence indicates that a piano was taken in by plaintiff from defendant in the transaction. The contract bears date…
2Cases cited13 opinions
- Cromwell v. County of SacSupreme Court of the United States · 1877
- Cromwell v. County of SacSupreme Court of the United States · 1878
- Parke & Lacy Co. v. White River Lumber Co.California Supreme Court · 1894
- Hines v. WardCalifornia Supreme Court · 1898
- Nauman Co. v. BradshawCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1912
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by20 opinions
- Fageol Truck & Coach Co. v. Pacific Indemnity Co.California Supreme Court · 1941
- B.K.K. Co. v. SchultzCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1970
- Smith v. MillerCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1935
- FRESHMAN, MULVANEY, MARANTZ v. Superior CourtCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1985
- Ravizza v. Budd & Quinn, Inc.California Supreme Court · 1942
15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.