Legal Opinion

Fox v. Dehn

California Court of Appeal

Decided September 30, 1974No. Civ. 42442PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion

STEPHENS, Acting P. J.

Appellants Louis Fox and Harold Fox seek reversal of the superior court’s order granting respondents’ motion for summary judgment. Appellants’ action sought damages for breach of contract by decedent, William Dehn. In their pleadings before the superior court, respondents successfully contended that the action (filed moré than five months after rejection of appellants’ claim by the executrix of decedent’s estate) was barred by the statute of limitations. The superior court granted summary judgment on the “statutory ground that the action has no merit and that no…

2Cases cited23 opinions

  1. Maguire v. Hibernia Savings & Loan SocietyCalifornia Supreme Court · 1944
  2. Gold Mining & Water Co. v. SwinertonCalifornia Supreme Court · 1943
  3. Baker v. JosephCalifornia Supreme Court · 1860
  4. Radar v. RogersCalifornia Supreme Court · 1957
  5. Verdier v. RoachCalifornia Supreme Court · 1892

18 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Conway v. Bughouse, Inc.California Court of Appeal · 1980
  2. Kinzli v. City of Santa CruzDistrict Court, N.D. California · 1982
  3. In Re Chemtura Corp.United States Bankruptcy Court, S.D. New York · 2011

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API