Legal Opinion

In Re Complaint as to the Conduct of Albrecht

Oregon Supreme Court

Decided March 14, 2002No. OSB 95-195; SC S45913PublishedCited by 9 opinions

1Per curiam

In this lawyer disciplinary proceeding, the Oregon State Bar (Bar) charged Nikolaus Albrecht (the accused) with four counts of violating Disciplinary Rule (DR) 1-102(A)(2) (prohibiting criminal act that reflects adversely on honesty, trustworthiness, or fitness to practice law) of the Code of Professional Responsibility, four counts of violating DR 1-102(A)(3) (prohibiting conduct involving dishonesty, fraud, deceit, or misrepresentation), four counts of violating DR 7-102(A)(7) (prohibiting assisting client in conduct that lawyer knows is illegal), four counts of violating DR 7-102(A)(8)…

2Cases cited12 opinions

  1. United States v. John Doe, Inc. ISupreme Court of the United States · 1987
  2. In Re Complaint as to the Conduct of WhiteOregon Supreme Court · 1991
  3. 96 Cal. Daily Op. Serv. 295, 96 Daily Journal D.A.R. 451 United States of America v. Agnes Marbella, United States of America v. Geronimo AmigableCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1996
  4. In Re Complaint as to the Conduct JohnsonOregon Supreme Court · 1985
  5. In Re Complaint as to Conduct of DeversOregon Supreme Court · 1999

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by9 opinions

  1. In Re Complaint as to the Conduct of EllisOregon Supreme Court · 2015
  2. In Re Complaint as to the Conduct of McDonoughOregon Supreme Court · 2003
  3. In Re Complaint as to the Conduct of PetersonOregon Supreme Court · 2010
  4. In Re Complaint as to the Conduct of StricklandOregon Supreme Court · 2005
  5. Smith v. MullarkeySupreme Court of Colorado · 2005

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API