Legal Opinion

Smith v. Mullarkey

Supreme Court of Colorado

Decided October 17, 2005No. 05SA238PublishedCited by 6 opinions

1Per curiam

This matter is before the court on appeal from the Denver District Court. The district court dismissed the case due to lack of subject matter jurisdiction on April 9, 2004. This appeal was originally filed with the Colorado Court of Appeals. That court filed a request for determination of jurisdiction with the supreme court, and on August 18, 2005, the supreme court assumed jurisdiction over the appeal due to the nature of the issues raised. In this per curiam order, the supreme court 1 now affirms the district court’s order of April 9, 2004 dismissing the ease due to lack of subject matter…

2Cases cited17 opinions

  1. John Doe v. E. E. PringleCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1976
  2. People v. MorleySupreme Court of Colorado · 1986
  3. Denver Bar Association v. Public Utilities CommissionSupreme Court of Colorado · 1964
  4. People v. RichmondSupreme Court of Colorado · 1891
  5. Conway-Bogue Realty Investment Co. v. Denver Bar Ass'nSupreme Court of Colorado · 1957

12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. Smith v. ScaliaDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2014
  2. Smith v. KriegerDistrict Court, D. Colorado · 2009
  3. Stephen Kerr Eugster v. Washington State Bar AssociationCourt of Appeals of Washington · 2017
  4. Smith v. United States Court of Appeals, for the Tenth CircuitCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 2007
  5. In re Chessin v. Office of Attorney Regulation CounselSupreme Court of Colorado · 2020

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API