Introducing ATLASLearn more
Legal Opinion

In Re Complaint as to the Conduct of McDonough

Oregon Supreme Court

Decided October 2, 2003No. OSB 00-20; SC S49503PublishedCited by 10 opinions

1Per curiam

In this lawyer disciplinary proceeding, the Oregon State Bar (Bar) charged Michael L. McDonough (the accused) with violating Code of Professional Responsibility Disciplinary Rule (DR) 1-102(A)(2) (committing criminal act that reflects adversely upon lawyer’s honesty, trustworthiness, or fitness to practice law) and with being subject to discipline under ORS 9.527(1) (conduct justifying denial of admission to Bar). A trial panel of the Disciplinary Board concluded that the accused was guilty of the alleged misconduct and imposed an 18-month suspension. Our review is automatic, ORS 9.536(2); BR…

2Cases cited12 opinions

  1. In Re Complaint as to the Conduct of WhiteOregon Supreme Court · 1991
  2. In Re Complaint as to the Conduct of KimmellOregon Supreme Court · 2001
  3. In Re RowellOregon Supreme Court · 1988
  4. In Re Complaint as to the Conduct of CarstensOregon Supreme Court · 1984
  5. In Re Complaint as to Conduct of MurdockOregon Supreme Court · 1998

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by10 opinions

  1. In Re LawrenceOregon Supreme Court · 2004
  2. Grew’s CaseSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 2007
  3. In Re CarpenterOregon Supreme Court · 2004
  4. In Re Complaint as to the Conduct of ChaseOregon Supreme Court · 2005
  5. In Re the Reciprocal Discipline of WaltonOregon Supreme Court · 2012

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

View API DocsGet API Key

Powered by the Exa API