Legal Opinion

In Re Complaint as to the Conduct of Strickland

Oregon Supreme Court

Decided December 15, 2005No. OSB 04-32; SC S52490PublishedCited by 6 opinions

1Per curiam

In this lawyer disciplinary proceeding, the Oregon State Bar charged the accused with violating ORS 9.527(2) and Oregon Code of Professional Responsibility Disciplinary Rules (DR) 1-102(A)(2) and DR 1-102(A)(3). Those charges stemmed from the accused’s criminal convictions for improper use of the emergency reporting system, ORS 165.570; initiating a false report, ORS 162.375; and disorderly conduct, ORS 166.025. A trial panel of the Disciplinary Board concluded that the accused was guilty of all charges, and it imposed a three-year suspension from the practice of law. The accused sought…

2Cases cited10 opinions

  1. In Re Complaint as to the Conduct of WhiteOregon Supreme Court · 1991
  2. In Re Complaint as to the Conduct of KimmellOregon Supreme Court · 2001
  3. In Re Complaint as to Conduct of MurdockOregon Supreme Court · 1998
  4. In Re Complaint as to the Conduct of DavenportOregon Supreme Court · 2002
  5. In Re Complaint as to the Conduct of LeonhardtOregon Supreme Court · 1997

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. In re MaurerOregon Supreme Court · 2018
  2. In re McGrawOregon Supreme Court · 2018
  3. State v. WiborgCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2017
  4. In Re Complaint as to the Conduct of SmithOregon Supreme Court · 2010
  5. In re GraeffOregon Supreme Court · 2021

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API