In Re Complaint as to the Conduct of Strickland
Oregon Supreme Court
1Per curiam
In this lawyer disciplinary proceeding, the Oregon State Bar charged the accused with violating ORS 9.527(2) and Oregon Code of Professional Responsibility Disciplinary Rules (DR) 1-102(A)(2) and DR 1-102(A)(3). Those charges stemmed from the accused’s criminal convictions for improper use of the emergency reporting system, ORS 165.570; initiating a false report, ORS 162.375; and disorderly conduct, ORS 166.025. A trial panel of the Disciplinary Board concluded that the accused was guilty of all charges, and it imposed a three-year suspension from the practice of law. The accused sought…
2Cases cited10 opinions
- In Re Complaint as to the Conduct of WhiteOregon Supreme Court · 1991
- In Re Complaint as to the Conduct of KimmellOregon Supreme Court · 2001
- In Re Complaint as to Conduct of MurdockOregon Supreme Court · 1998
- In Re Complaint as to the Conduct of DavenportOregon Supreme Court · 2002
- In Re Complaint as to the Conduct of LeonhardtOregon Supreme Court · 1997
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by6 opinions
- In re MaurerOregon Supreme Court · 2018
- In re McGrawOregon Supreme Court · 2018
- State v. WiborgCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2017
- In Re Complaint as to the Conduct of SmithOregon Supreme Court · 2010
- In re GraeffOregon Supreme Court · 2021
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.