Legal Opinion

State v. Twitty

Court of Appeals of Oregon

Decided April 22, 1987No. 85-CR-478; CA A39395PublishedCited by 19 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtWarden, P. J.

Defendant appeals his conviction for murder, ORS 163.115, assigning eight errors. We affirm the conviction but reverse and remand as to certain costs assessed against defendant.

Defendant’s first assignment is that the trial court erred in permitting him to waive his right to counsel and to represent himself at trial, because the court mistakenly advised him that imposition of a 10-year minimum sentence would not be mandatory if he were convicted of murder.

Article I, section 11, of the Oregon Constitution provides that “[i]n all criminal prosecutions, the accused shall have the right * * * to…

2Cases cited21 opinions

  1. Chapman v. CaliforniaSupreme Court of the United States · 1967
  2. Johnson v. ZerbstSupreme Court of the United States · 1938
  3. Faretta v. CaliforniaSupreme Court of the United States · 1975
  4. Hill v. LockhartSupreme Court of the United States · 1985
  5. Duncan v. LouisianaSupreme Court of the United States · 1968

16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by19 opinions

  1. State v. MeyerCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1992
  2. Moen v. PetersonCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1990
  3. State v. MorrowCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2004
  4. State v. CarterCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1991
  5. State v. BoswellCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1988

14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API