Legal Opinion

State, Ex Rel. v. Indus. Comm.

Ohio Supreme Court

Decided April 19, 1933No. 23575PublishedCited by 20 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

This is an original action in this court. The relator, Joseph Cezkovsky, seeks a writ commanding the Industrial Commission of Ohio to grant him a rehearing of his claim for compensation from the workmen's compensation fund. Issue was heretofore presented by demurrer to the answer, which was overruled. State, ex rel. Cezkovsky, v. IndustrialCommission, ante, 39, 183 N.E. 865. Thereafter a reply was filed and the case was submitted upon its merits. There is no controversy as to the facts.

The relator sustained an injury while in the course of his employment with a company which had complied with…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Baltimore & Ohio Rd. Co. v. BaillieOhio Supreme Court · 1925
  2. State, Ex Rel. v. Indus. Comm.Ohio Supreme Court · 1932
  3. State Ex Rel. Hile v. ZangerleOhio Supreme Court · 1926
  4. Industrial Commission v. PhillipsOhio Supreme Court · 1926
  5. State, Ex Rel. v. Indus. Comm.Ohio Supreme Court · 1932

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by20 opinions

  1. Zavatsky v. StringerOhio Supreme Court · 1978
  2. Kaiser v. Industrial CommissionOhio Supreme Court · 1940
  3. State, Ex Rel. v. Indus. Comm.Ohio Supreme Court · 1934
  4. Noggle v. Industrial CommissionOhio Supreme Court · 1935
  5. State, Ex Rel. v. Indus. Comm.Ohio Supreme Court · 1934

15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API