Baltimore & Ohio Rd. Co. v. Baillie
Ohio Supreme Court
1Opinion of the CourtMatthias, J.
The question is here clearly presented whether the provisions of Section 11273, General Code, preclude the bringing of an action in a county of this state against the persons and companies enumerated in that section by a resident of another state for injuries to person or property occurring elsewhere than in this state, where the injury complained of resulted from the joint negligence of a railroad company and another corporation against which the action is maintainable in such county of this state.
If this suit were against the Baltimore & Ohio Railroad Company alone there would be no…
2Cases cited2 opinions
- Chicago City v. RobbinsSupreme Court of the United States · 1863
- City of Rochester v. . CampbellNew York Court of Appeals · 1890
3Cited by49 opinions
- Ohio v. RobertsSupreme Court of the United States · 1980
- Perkins v. Benguet Consolidated Mining Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1952
- Williamson Heater. Co. v. RadichOhio Supreme Court · 1934
- Stewart v. B.F. Goodrich Co.Ohio Court of Appeals · 1993
- Smith v. KlemOhio Supreme Court · 1983
44 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.