Kaiser v. Industrial Commission
Ohio Supreme Court
1Opinion of the CourtWilliams, J.
Accidental injuries due to the elements or forces of nature have been held compensable when suffered by employees .exposed to a greater hazard by virtue of their employment than were other persons in the locality. Industrial Commission v. Carden, 129 Ohio St., 344, 195 N. E., 551; Industrial Commission v. Hampton, 123 Ohio St., 500, 176 N. E., 74; Slanina v. Industrial Commission, 117 Ohio St., 329, 158 N. E., 829; 42 Ohio Jurisprudence, 657, Section 70. This principle has been applied to accidental injuries from freezing when the exposure to cold weather which the employee was compelled to…
2Cases cited18 opinions
- Larke v. John Hancock Mutual Life InsuranceSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1916
- State, Ex Rel. v. Indus. Comm.Ohio Supreme Court · 1932
- McManaman's CaseMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1916
- Louisville & Nashville Rd. v. GreeneOhio Supreme Court · 1925
- W. S. Tyler Co. v. RebicOhio Supreme Court · 1928
13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by31 opinions
- Malone v. Industrial CommissionOhio Supreme Court · 1942
- Webb v. New Mexico Pub. Co.New Mexico Supreme Court · 1943
- State ex rel. Gatlin v. Yellow Freight System, Inc.Ohio Supreme Court · 1985
- Lewis v. TrimbleOhio Supreme Court · 1997
- Gerich v. Republic Steel Corp.Ohio Supreme Court · 1950
26 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.