State, Ex Rel. v. Indus. Comm.
Ohio Supreme Court
1Opinion of the Court
While the section of the General Code involved in this case may be abstruse to some extent, the issue is unquestionably clean cut. Whether or not Araca, the relator herein, is entitled, as a matter of law, to a rehearing before the Industrial Commission, is the sole question for determination.
There is no issue of fact in the case. The question of law arises by reason of the susceptibility to different interpretations of certain parts of Section 1465-90, General Code of Ohio, defining the jurisdiction and duties of the Industrial Commission of the state of Ohio.
So much of Section 1465-90,…
2Cases cited2 opinions
- Slatmeyer v. Industrial CommissionOhio Supreme Court · 1926
- State, Ex Rel. v. Indus. Comm.Ohio Supreme Court · 1932
3Cited by18 opinions
- Zavatsky v. StringerOhio Supreme Court · 1978
- State, Ex Rel. v. Indus. Comm.Ohio Supreme Court · 1934
- State, Ex Rel. v. Indus. Comm.Ohio Supreme Court · 1933
- State, Ex Rel. v. Indus. Comm.Ohio Supreme Court · 1934
- State, Ex Rel. v. Indus. Comm.Ohio Supreme Court · 1932
13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.