Legal Opinion

State, Ex Rel. v. Indus. Comm.

Ohio Supreme Court

Decided March 14, 1934No. 24455PublishedCited by 13 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

This is an original action in this court, in which the relator seeks a writ of mandamus to require the Industrial Commission to grant him a rehearing of his claim for compensation. Upon the complaint of the relator, filed September 27, 1930, that he had suffered a disability as a result of injury, the Industrial Commission assumed jurisdiction of his claim and made an award of $169.14 for temporary total disability for the period designated, being from August 7, 1930, to October 19, 1930. The claim of the relator was that on July 30, 1930, while digging in a waterworks trench, he came in…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. State Ex Rel. Hile v. ZangerleOhio Supreme Court · 1926
  2. Industrial Commission v. PhillipsOhio Supreme Court · 1926
  3. State, Ex Rel. v. Indus. Comm.Ohio Supreme Court · 1933
  4. State, Ex Rel. v. Indus. Comm.Ohio Supreme Court · 1932

3Cited by13 opinions

  1. State, Ex Rel. v. Indus. Comm.Ohio Supreme Court · 1934
  2. Humphries v. Wheeling Steel Corp.Ohio Supreme Court · 1937
  3. State, Ex Rel. v. Indus. Comm.Ohio Supreme Court · 1939
  4. State, Ex Rel. v. Indus. Comm.Ohio Supreme Court · 1935
  5. McManus v. Industrial CommissionOhio Court of Appeals · 1940

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API