Legal Opinion

Kalkruth v. Resort Properties, Ltd.

California Court of Appeal

Decided February 15, 1943No. Civ. 2961PublishedCited by 8 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtMarks, J.

This is an appeal from a judgment quieting plaintiffs’ title to real estate and awarding them damages in the sum of $790.50 because they were sold one certain lot after they had been shown, and when they believed they were buying another. We will refer to Resort Properties, Limited, as the defendant.

Defendant presents four grounds for reversal of the judgment: (1) That the findings of fraud are not supported by the evidence; (2) that the action is barred by the statute of limitations; (3) that plaintiffs discovered the falseness of the representations in 1935 and had no right to thereafter…

2Cases cited21 opinions

  1. Lady Washington Consolidated Co. v. WoodCalifornia Supreme Court · 1896
  2. Consolidated Reservoir & Power Co. v. ScarboroughCalifornia Supreme Court · 1932
  3. Speck v. WylieCalifornia Supreme Court · 1934
  4. Graham v. Los Angeles First National Trust & Savings BankCalifornia Supreme Court · 1935
  5. Longway v. NewberyCalifornia Supreme Court · 1939

16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by8 opinions

  1. Sime v. MaloufCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1949
  2. Lobdell v. MillerCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1952
  3. Falls Sand and Gravel Co. v. Western Concrete, Inc.District Court, D. Montana · 1967
  4. Blackman v. HowesCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1947
  5. Bank of America National Trust & Savings Ass'n v. VanniniCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1956

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API