Legal Opinion

Longway v. Newbery

California Supreme Court

Decided June 2, 1939No. L. A. 15892PublishedCited by 19 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

THE COURT.

A hearing was granted in this court after decision by the District Court of Appeal, Third Appellate District, in order to give further consideration to the question relating to. the liability, if any, of the defendant, Cad M. Newbery, and also to the question of the sufficiency of the evidence to support certain of the findings made by the trial court.

From a judgment in favor of the defendants in an action for rescission, the plaintiff has appealed.

There was no substantial conflict in the evidence. The uncontradicted facts surrounding the purchase of two lots by plaintiff wére as…

2Cases cited19 opinions

  1. Smith v. BachCalifornia Supreme Court · 1920
  2. Mary Pickford Co. v. Bayly Bros., Inc.California Supreme Court · 1939
  3. Speck v. WylieCalifornia Supreme Court · 1934
  4. Wilson v. Rigali & VeselichCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1934
  5. Graham v. Los Angeles First National Trust & Savings BankCalifornia Supreme Court · 1935

14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by19 opinions

  1. Coast Bank v. HolmesCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1971
  2. Boyd v. BevilacquaCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1966
  3. Tranchina v. ArcinasCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1947
  4. Butler v. NeppleCalifornia Supreme Court · 1960
  5. Berkey v. HalmCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1950

14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API