Legal Opinion

Speck v. Wylie

California Supreme Court

Decided October 10, 1934No. L. A. 13205PublishedCited by 34 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtPreston, J.

This suit is by purchasers of certain real property in Los Angeles County under an installment contract to recover from the sellers thereof the several amounts paid thereon, following timely notice of rescission and offer of restoration. Under the findings it must be taken as proved that the purchase was induced by material misrepresentations fraudulently made by the agent of the sellers who was in charge of the negotiations. Plaintiffs had judgment as prayed and defendants have appealed therefrom.

The contract was in writing and contained the following clause: “It is understood and agreed…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. Gridley v. TilsonCalifornia Supreme Court · 1927

3Cited by34 opinions

  1. Rutherford v. Rideout BankCalifornia Supreme Court · 1938
  2. Rothstein v. Janss Investment Corp.California Court of Appeal · 1941
  3. J. C. Millett Co. v. Park & Tilford Distillers Corp.District Court, N.D. California · 1954
  4. Herzog v. Capital Co.California Supreme Court · 1945
  5. Scholey v. SteeleCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1943

29 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API