Speck v. Wylie
California Supreme Court
1Opinion of the CourtPreston, J.
This suit is by purchasers of certain real property in Los Angeles County under an installment contract to recover from the sellers thereof the several amounts paid thereon, following timely notice of rescission and offer of restoration. Under the findings it must be taken as proved that the purchase was induced by material misrepresentations fraudulently made by the agent of the sellers who was in charge of the negotiations. Plaintiffs had judgment as prayed and defendants have appealed therefrom.
The contract was in writing and contained the following clause: “It is understood and agreed…
2Cases cited1 opinion
- Gridley v. TilsonCalifornia Supreme Court · 1927
3Cited by34 opinions
- Rutherford v. Rideout BankCalifornia Supreme Court · 1938
- Rothstein v. Janss Investment Corp.California Court of Appeal · 1941
- J. C. Millett Co. v. Park & Tilford Distillers Corp.District Court, N.D. California · 1954
- Herzog v. Capital Co.California Supreme Court · 1945
- Scholey v. SteeleCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1943
29 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.